Hasan II, Ala Dhikrihil泭Salam, Nizari Ismaili泭Imam泭and the fourth ruler of泭Alamut泭(557-61 AH/1162-66 CE). Born in 520AH /1126 CE,泭Imam泭Hasan II, whom the泭Nizaris泭address as ala Dhikrihil泭Salam泭(on his mention be peace), succeeded to the leadership of the Nizari Ismaili泭dawa泭and state on the death of the third ruler of泭AlamutFortress of the Nizari Ismailis in northern Iran, which fell to the Mongols in 654 AH/1256 CE., Muhammad b. Buzurg-Umid on 4 Rabi I 557 AH/ 21 February 1162 CE.
Imam泭Hasan is said to have developed an early interest in learning Ismaili doctrines as well as studying philosophical and Sufi writings. In particular, he became well-versed in泭喧硃w勳梭, or esoteric exegesis, which had been applied by the泭Ismailis泭to Quranic passages as well as the commandments and prohibitions of the泭sharia泭(Islamic law).
Declaration of the Qiyama
Already in the time of Muhammad b. Buzurg -Umid (532-57 AH/1138-62 CE),泭Imam泭Hasan II had acquired followers who regarded him as the泭Imam泭promised by Hasan al-Sabbah, the first ruler of泭Alamut. Left without a manifest泭Imam泭since泭Imam泭Nizar b. al-Mustansirs death in 488 AH/1095 CE, the泭Nizaris泭had acknowledged Muhammad b. Buzurg-Umid and his predecessors at泭Alamut泭merely as泭餃硃i莽泭硃紳餃泭hujjas, or chief representatives, of their hidden Imams.
The most important event of泭Imam泭Hasan IIs brief reign was his declaration of the泭qiyama泭(the Resurrection), which initiated a new phase in the history of the泭Nizaris泭of the泭Alamut泭period (483-654 AH/1090-1256 CE). After making careful preparations, in a solemn ceremony at泭Alamut泭on 17 Ramadan 559 AH/ 8 August 1164 CE, in the presence of representatives from different Nizari territories who had been summoned there,泭Imam泭Hasan II delivered a泭域堯喝喧莉硃泭and passed on new instructions from the Nizari Imam; according to these instructions the泭Nizaris泭had now been brought to the泭qiyamathe Resurrection was upon them. Soon afterwards, on 28 Dhul-qida 559 AH/ 18 October 1164 CE, a similar ceremony was held at the castle of Mumin-Abad to the east of泭BirjandA city in Quhistan, in southern Khurasan in Iran., the local headquarters of the泭Nizaris泭in Quhistan. On that occasion泭Imam泭Hasan IIs new declarations were read out to the representatives of the泭Nizaris泭of that region by Rais Muzaffar, the泭muhtasham,泭or chief, of the Quhistani泭NizarisAdherents of a branch of the Ismailis who gave allegiance to Nizar, the eldest son of the Fatimid Imam-caliph al-Mustansir (d. 1094) as his successor.. The ruler of泭Alamut泭had now also announced that, just as previously the Fatimid泭Imam泭al-Mustansir had been Gods泭khalifa泭on earth, so now泭Imam泭Hasan II himself was that泭khalifa. In other words,泭Imam泭Hasan II had now also claimed the Nizari泭Imamate泭for himself, at least implicitly. Subsequently,泭Imam泭Hasan II in his epistles (fusul) implied more clearly that he was the泭Imam, the son of an泭Imam泭from the progeny of泭Imam泭Nizar b. al- Mustansir, even though he had been considered to be the son of Muhammad b. Buzurg-Umid. The contemporary泭Nizaris泭accepted this claim, which was reiterated more explicitly by泭Imam泭Hasan IIs son and successor泭Imam泭Nur泭al-Din泭Muhammad. It fell to Rashid泭al-Din泭Sinan (d. 589 AH/ 1193 CE), the most famous of the Nizari泭餃硃is in Syria and the original Old Man of the Mountain of the泭CrusadersA term applied to Christian invaders who carried out numerous campaigns to capture Jerusalem and Palestine from the Muslims in the 11th and 14th centuries CE., to declare the泭qiyama泭to the Syrian泭Nizaris泭soon after 559 AH/ 1164 CE.
The Last Day announcement
By declaring the泭qiyama,泭Imam泭Hasan II had in effect announced the Last Day, which was eventually interpreted to mean the manifestation of the unveiled truth (haqiqa)泭that had hitherto been hidden in the泭batin泭or esoteric dimension of the Islamic message.
This was made manifest in the person of the Nizari泭Imam, who, as the enunciator of the泭qiyama, the qaim泭al-qiyama, held a rank even higher than that of an ordinary泭Imam. As a result, the members of the Nizari community who acknowledged the Nizari泭Imam泭were now capable of understanding the true esoteric meaning of the religious laws, and as such, Paradise was actualised for them in this world.
Joveyni, Rashid泭al-Din, and Kashani, who are the main authorities on the history of the Persian Nizari state, relate that, in line with the circumstances expected in the泭qiyama, the final eschatological泭dawr泭(era of human history),泭Imam泭Hasan II also announced the abrogation of [blind observance of] the泭sharia, which had been enforced rigorously by his predecessors at泭Alamut.
Hasan II’s death and succession
In view of the absence of contemporary Nizari sources from the泭qiyama泭times and the negative bias of the non-Ismaili sources on the subject, it is difficult to know for certain how the declaration of the泭qiyama泭was actually perceived by the泭Nizaris, who continued to regard themselves as Ismaili Shii.
At any rate, Joveyni and other anti-Ismaili authorities, despite their hostile stances, do not report any instances of libertine and permissivist behavior amongst the Persian泭Nizaris泭immediately after the泭qiyama, even though the Nizari leadership had now begun to stress the spiritual inner-interpretation of the law in preference to the blind observance of its literal meaning.
On Sunday 6 Rabi I 561 AH/ 9 January 1166 CE, Hasan II泭ala Dhikrihil泭Salam泭was stabbed to death in the castle of Lammasar (Lanbasar; west of Alamut) by Hasan b. Namavar, a brother-in-law who opposed his new policies.
Imam泭Hasans son and successor,泭Imam泭Nur泭al-Din泭Muhammad, devoted his own long reign (561-607 AH/ 1166-1210 CE) to a systematic elaboration of the doctrine of the泭qiyama.
Authors
Dr Farhad Daftary
Co-Director and Head of the Department of Academic Research and Publications
An authority in Shi’i studies, with special reference to its Ismaili tradition, Dr. Daftary has published and lectured widely in these fields of Islamic studies. In 2011 a Festschrift entitled泭Fortresses of the Intellect泭was produced to honour Dr. Daftary by a number of his colleagues and peers.
Primary sources
- Ala泭al-Din泭Joveyni,泭Tarikh-e jahan goshay,泭ed. Muhammad Qazvini, Leiden, 1912-37, III, pp. 225-39; tr. John A. Boyle, Manchester, II, pp. 688-97.
- Abul-Qasim Abd-Allah b. Ali Kashani,泭Zubdat al-tawarikh: bakhsh-e Fatimian wa Nizarian, ed. Muhammad-Taqi Danishpazhuh, 2nd ed., Tehran, 1366 Sh./1987, pp. 199-208.
- Abu Eshaq Quhistani,泭Haft泭bab, ed. and tr. Wladimir Ivanow, Bombay, 1959, text: pp. 19, 24, 38-44, 46-47, 53, 58, 65; translation: pp. 19, 23, 38-44, 46-47, 53-54, 58, 65.
- Rashid-al-Din Fadl-Allah,泭Jami al-tawarikh: qismat-e Esmailian, ed. Muhammad-Taqi Danishpazhuh and M. Mudarrisi-Zanjani, Tehran, 1338 Sh./1959, pp. 162-70.
- Anon.,泭Haft bab-e Baba Sayyedna, in泭Two Early Ismaili Treatises, ed. Wladimir Ivanow, Bombay, 1933, pp. 4-44.
Secondary sources
- Henry Corbin, Huiti癡me centenaire dAlamut,泭Mercure de France, February, 1965, pp. 285-304.
- Henry Corbin,泭Cyclical Time and Ismaili Gnosis, London, 1983, pp. 47-58, 97, 117, 155-56.
- Farhad Daftary,泭The Ismailis: Their History and Doctrines, Cambridge, 1990, pp. 385-92, 400-402, 408, 410-11, 415.
- Farhad Daftary, Persian Historiography of the Early Nizari泭Ismailis,泭Iran泭30, 1992, pp. 91-97.
- Farhad Daftary,泭The Assassin Legends: Myths of the Ismailis, London, 1994, pp. 40-41, 42, 78-79, 99, 145-46, 178.
- Marshall G. S. Hodgson,泭The Order of Assassins, The Hague, 1955, pp. 148-59, 279-324 (containing the Eng. tr. of the anonymous泭Haft bab-e Baba Sayyedna).
- Christian Jambet,泭La grande r矇surrection dAlamut, Lagrasse, 1990, especially pp. 35-73, 95-135, 295 ff.
- Ismail K. Poonawala,泭Biobibliography of Ismaili Literature, Malibu, Calif., 1977, pp. 257-58.